• poVoqOP
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I was a bit confused as well at first, but I think later in the article it becomes clear that the same meeting is ment and the main point of this article is to describe what happened in the years after.

    • krolden
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      He said they both inquired about shock collars on their security forces. While I would never put it past billionaires to use corporal punishment like that, I doubt they would fly out this rando columnist guy for a consultation on how to control their employees after the apocalypse, let alone TWICE and ask the same exact questions.

      • poVoqOP
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Again… same meeting. Did you only read the first 3 paragraphs?

        It doesn’t matter if the original meeting took place or not, the article is mainly about all the people that contacted this author after he published the original article in 2018.